Glassnode: Bitcoin Enters Consolidation Phase, $55k to $79k Key Support Range
Original Title: Structural Weakness
Original Authors: Chris Beamish, CryptoVizArt, Antoine Colpaert, Glassnode
Original Translation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News
Bitcoin is still defending the $60,000-$72,000 range, with selling pressure in the $82,000-$97,000 range limiting any rebound. Outflows, low spot volume, and cooling futures all indicate weak demand, causing the price to react passively rather than break out actively.
Summary
· Bitcoin is trapped between the Realized Market Value (around $79,200) and the Realized Price (around $55,000). After the structural weakness, the market has been on the defensive, with the $60,000-$72,000 range still facing selling pressure.
· Significant chip stacks are present in the $82,000-$97,000 and $100,000-$117,000 ranges, all currently at unrealized losses, posing significant resistance to any rebound.
· Short-term holders are generally at a loss, new entrants lack confidence, making it difficult for an uptrend to gain momentum.
· Net outflows of digital asset holdings by various institutions are synchronized, indicating a broad risk-off behavior, with weak spot accumulation.
· Spot volume only expands on the downside before quickly tapering off, showing a passive response rather than active bottom-fishing.
· Perpetual contracts have cooled off, with compressed premiums, leveraged players stepping back, and speculative sentiment receding.
· Implied volatility indicates the market is still continuously seeking protection, maintaining a defensive posture.
· The option market's position structure makes price reversals easy and limits substantial movement, given the already tight liquidity.
On-Chain Insights
After reaching a new high in October last year, Bitcoin went through three phases: first a sharp drop, repeatedly testing the Realized Market Value; then a period of consolidation until the end of January this year; and most recently, the third phase—breaking below the Realized Market Value, accelerating towards $60,000.
New Trading Range
The upper bound of the third phase's range is the Realized Market Value at $79,200, and the lower bound is the Realized Price at $55,000, resembling the structure of the first half of 2022.
Similar to the second quarter of 2022, the price is likely to oscillate within this range, requiring time to grind, allowing new buyers to enter slowly and absorb supply.
In the short term, to break this situation, it either needs to be extremely strong—directly reclaiming the $79.2k real market value, and regaining strength, or extremely weak—experiencing an event on the level of LUNA or FTX, breaking through the $55k realized price. If neither extreme occurs, the most likely path for the market is to continue grinding within the range.

Range Support
So far, the range between $60k and $72k is still holding off selling pressure. This range was a high-volume trading area in the first half of 2024, and by holding once again, it indicates that there are indeed buyers stepping in at this level.
The ideal scenario is that if this level can continue to attract buyers, similar to the previous strong accumulation phases, it could establish a solid base for the next uptrend.
However, this depends on whether the buying pressure is resolute enough. The $60k to $72k range, how much real money buyers are willing to put on the line will determine whether the market stabilizes or fails to hold and continues to decline.

Selling Pressure
To determine if the $60k to $72k range is indeed strengthening, one can look at the cost distribution. The UTXO realized price distribution shows the concentration of chips at each price level. Currently, the dense area formed in the first half of 2024—the $60k to $72k range—is being supported, indicating that those who bought at that time have not exited at this level and are still holding.
However, there is still significant selling pressure. The $82k to $97k and $100k to $117k ranges have very dense trapped sellers. If the price remains stagnant for a long time or experiences another wave of decline, these individuals may not withstand the pressure and may sell off, creating new selling pressure.

Where Will the Bear Market Rebound Peak
Since the market is likely to grind within the range, finding the interim top and bottom is crucial. In a bear market, rebounds are often seen as exit opportunities by those who recently bought in. Therefore, when these individuals start to realize significant gains, it often marks a local top.
The short-term holder profit ratio is a suitable metric to observe this. Historically, when the bear market rebound reaches the "mean to +0.5 standard deviation" range of this metric, it often struggles to rise further. Currently, this number is only 4.9%, indicating that the vast majority of recent market participants are still at a loss. Few are in profit, making it difficult to create downward pressure, but it also indicates a weak market with no fresh capital inflows, making it challenging for the rebound to extend.

Off-chain Insight
Institutional Funds Exiting
The outflow of digital asset funds has recently turned significantly negative, with ETFs, enterprises, and governments all experiencing net outflows, and Bitcoin hitting a new low. ETFs are the main contributors, with enterprises and governments also reducing their positions. This is not a case of individual fund rebalancing; rather, the institutional players across the entire market are downsizing.
The outflow volume is substantial, overwhelming the spot market. This is not a rotation of funds between different asset classes but a comprehensive derisking. Unless these outflows stabilize, the price will continue to face selling pressure. The extent of the potential decline will depend on when new buyers are willing to enter the market.

Low Spot Trading Volume
When the price dropped to the $70,000 range, there was a brief spike in spot trading volume, lifting the 7-day average. However, this volume came during a downturn, indicating a passive response from market participants rather than proactive bottom fishing. Furthermore, this volume quickly retracted, suggesting that people were watching but not buying.
This indicates that the buying pressure is not keeping pace with the selling pressure. The current trading volume does not represent accumulation but rather turnover and forced liquidations. Without sustained buying interest, the price is susceptible to further downside pressure. The current spot volume reflects a reactive response to panic, not a signal of stabilization.

Decline in Futures Premium
The premium of perpetual contracts has been pushed down, essentially returning to a neutral state. This indicates that leveraged players have backed off; unlike before, they are no longer aggressively pursuing both long and short positions. High premiums often signal a strong directional consensus, but the absence of a premium suggests a lack of market conviction.
The shrinking premium reflects a general lack of activity in the derivatives market, as risk appetite has diminished along with volatility. No one is opening short positions, and no one dares to chase long positions. Directional capital is thin. Derivatives no longer provide momentum, leaving the spot market on its own. The current futures market is sending a single message: caution, the game is over.

Implied Volatility — Changing Risk Pricing
Following this recent downturn, the volatility structure has significantly shifted. Looking at the 1-month at-the-money implied volatility makes this evident; the longer-term volatilities have been repriced: a 5-point increase in 6-month volatility and a 9-point increase in 3-month volatility.
The most notable jump is in the short-term, with 1-week implied volatility surging by over 20 points. Implied volatility represents the market's expectation of future price swings; such a significant surge is unlikely to be temporary. The entire term structure is undergoing a risk repricing.
Although the price has dropped somewhat, interest rates at all maturities remain high, indicating that the market believes uncertainty will persist and that it's not all clear after a drop.

25 Delta Skewness Indicates Ongoing Downside Demand
The overall volatility has increased, but the direction of the money flow depends on the skewness. The 25 delta skewness for 1 month and 3 months plummeted in a straight line during those down days, all buying puts.
There was a rebound on Friday, but the put option premium is still very high, basically returning to the levels of those days when the market fell the most. The 25 delta skewness compares the implied volatility of out-of-the-money puts and calls, with a negative value indicating that puts are more expensive than calls, and everyone is more willing to buy protection. Around January 28, the 1-month and 3-month skewness was approximately an 8% put premium, which has now increased to 23% and 19%.
The entire curve still tilts towards puts, and despite the rebound, the fear has not dissipated.

Market Maker Gamma — Price Rebound
This defensive options flow leaves a mark on the market maker's position. When the market maker is short gamma, they need to buy on the rise and sell on the fall, amplifying volatility with more volatility, rather than dampening it.
The previous wave of heavy put buying has left the market maker's structure unable to recover. Although there have been several days of rebound, this sensitivity has not been eliminated. As a result, the market is very fragile, with hedging orders likely to accelerate in both directions, but the probability of a downward move is higher.

Open Interest Heatmap Shows Extensive Hedging
The latest heatmap overlays BTC options open interest for various strike prices and expiry dates, making it easy to see where the money is concentrated and where there may be pricing pressure.
For the February expiry, the largest buy orders are between 60,000 and 70,000. Looking further out, towards the end of the year and longer-dated contracts, there is abundant buying interest between 50,000 and 30,000.
This is not an anticipation of an event at a specific time but a strategy to hedge against multiple periods of decline. It's not a precise bet on a specific price level but rather spreading coverage across a range, a classic range hedge. Call open interest is concentrated above 120,000 for the second half of the year. The money betting on a short-term rise is cashing out, while those anticipating a long-term decline are holding it as tail risk, and this deep negative skewness is how it comes about.
The entire position structure is defensive, not playing for a reversal.

Conclusion
Bitcoin is still within a defensive structure, with the price sandwiched between several key cost levels, and the crucial support area is being repeatedly tested. The range of $60k to $72k is still facing selling pressure, but there is heavy overhead resistance, with short-term holders in loss and weak confidence. In this scenario, any rebound is easily pushed back, and to stabilize, continuous buying pressure is needed.
The on-chain data also confirms this cautious assessment. Institutions are withdrawing, spot transactions are passive, not actively absorbing liquidity. On the derivatives side, speculative sentiment has cooled down, hedging is still occurring, and the structure of market makers is keeping the price highly volatile and making it difficult to establish direction.
Overall, the market is in a balanced period under pressure. Liquidity is thin, participation is scattered, and the position structure is leaning defensive. To see a turnaround, either spot buying pressure needs to increase, or risk appetite needs to return. Until then, the volatility will continue to be driven by short-term position trading, not by a trend.
You may also like

Found a "meme coin" that skyrocketed in just a few days. Any tips?

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.

Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun

Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold

Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar

Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?

Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire

Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition

From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash

